matthias

I must admit it is very strange: Some say the new OS has been launched several weeks ago and others say it is still in beta. I think Jord should clarify.

AFAIK, if you buy a PF streamer the software is included. I am not aware that they sell their software without streamer.

I don't think so but ask PF directly...

After reading this my gut feeling says: Run away from Euphony... 😎

Pink Faun cured themselves of Euphony too. At least this is my understanding. AFAIK, the new Pink Faun OS is not Euphony based and sounds superior. 😎

According to this FB post from Australia it is released since September: https://www.facebook.com/PuraAu/photos/pink-faun-high-end-audio-has-to-be-one-of-the-hardest-working-companies-in-audio/977860857472361/?_rdr

Thanks for sharing. PF mention on their FB that there are some 2.16 ultra set-ups running the new OS. Did you get the chance to try it?

https://www.pinkfaun.com/shop/content/51-scion PF mention a new in-house developed software platform, most probably the new Pink Faun OS for all their streamers.

https://www.monoandstereo.com/pink-faun-scion-music-server/ Can someone share some info about the new SCION and their new OS? Thanks

@di-fi Sorry, but your arguments do not convince me at all. It seems to be the same for manufacturers. I would never buy such a device and see only disadvantages. I do not understand what you will gain with it. Most probably it will be more expensive than separate devices for the same SQ, but YMMV. All the best 🙂

1.) Upgrades: The frequency of a 3-in-one device is threefold in comparison to one device. In the worst case you have to send it back to the manufacturer. 2.) With separate devices all have their own or one separate power supply and their own case. These two points provide better SQ in comparison to all-in-one. 3.) There might be different router requirements in different continents. 4.) Some router/streamer combos offer better SQ without a switch in between. 5.) Most people wouldn't like to have the function of a router in their living room. 6.) Some people prefer to have a wifi connection between router and switch or streamer. 7.) Most people want to replace either router (or switch) or streamer and not all together. 8.) Because of different requirements it might to more difficult to sell on the used market. 9.) The case of a 3-in-one might be too big for some racks. Surely there are more... 😎

My interpretation of Marcin's post with the "free dinner" is that XACT S1 sounds as good as it is because all is reduced what does not contribute to excellent sound. I don't think that an all-in-one device (router/switch/server) will provide the same high SQ as separate devices. Beside that there are other disadvantages with this concept.

Correct, but from Emile's posts I have the impression that he prefers lower AWG numbers than 30. @Superdad Agree, interesting would be a comparison Melco vs Amphenol.

Yes, the longest 7m passive one use 24AWG. According to Taiko Audio the longer DAC cable gives fuller/warmer sound. This is more likely due to the wire gauge used. The difference between 24AWG and 30AWG is factor 4 in area. So it is up to personal taste whether to go for longer/thicker or shorter/thinner cables. Maybe Amphenol will launch a short 24AWG in the future. https://cdn.amphenol-cs.com/media/wysiwyg/files/documentation/datasheet/cableassemblies/hsio_ca_sfp.pdf

Yes, the audiophile Melco cable is 24AWG and at least according to the thread on WBF superior to other less expensive DAC cables. But I am wondering if it is just the 24AWG which makes the Melco better as nearly all other cables use the much thinner 30AWG.