Ralf11

It serves the benefit of those who sell exorbitantly priced but worthless products.

I thought Sandy was removed from this thread - why are you addressing him?

you define enjoyment differently that I do - falseness doesn't count in my book I suggest that YOU do a self-assessment, and think hard about your "livelihood" vs. claims of creating an "enjoyment space" for the deluded, as you have several times posted about these disparate issues.

It does! That area of science is called Abnormal Psychology.

you have me confused with someone else

you said this place was your livelihood - now say it is not about money you need to make up your mind

drive more

I agree that many lack self control and go off the rails screaming when someone points out that simple physics proves they are hearing confirmation bias, not sound.

Have you ever been on a sports car forum?? Track times are always mentioned and compared.

was he exonerated? or kicked out? I heard which, but it hard to keep track of all the bad actors and accusations...

he was too naughty

Sure but all your MPR stations are above average

actually, Alex can - but the duty cycle is only about 20%

Splitting posts made on a thread so that they no longer exist on that thread is clearly censorship I hope you realize that

if you didn't understand the post you could have asked questions if you dislike PART of the Op in that thread you could have asked me to modify it you did neither but that isn't the point... you are censoring technical discussion with your new Stylist rules

of course you have censored things what is wrong with you?

the issue is, - are you going to apply a device that was not designed for audio - like an optical router or cable, and use it to solve problems in SQ

It is not about music at all, or preferences thereof. It IS about how to reproduce recorded music with electronic and mechanical devices to get the best SQ (or some euphonic distortion, such as tubey goodness). Censoring factual comments move this site FURTHER from that goal, not closer. But perhaps I mistake your actual goal in running this site?

I should have said there is no agreement on what the horrible component is, and most are unwilling to pick anything.

and no one has been willing to state what part of your system is so horrible ...

Advertisers don't like that some people think.

shouldn't you post in the snark forum?

what is the basis for this assertion?

easily inflamed?

their frowns are really the smiles of people standing upside down not sure if that is the cause of their noise fetishes or not